Do you remember what “open world” once meant? Back when just that phrase was enough to grab your attention. An open world is a huge, untapped map, an unseen horizon. A world where beyond that hill lay the adventure that no one had ever spoken of to you. But this is all gone. Somehow, somewhere in between the dragon yells in Skyrim and the fortieth tower of Ubisoft that you have to climb this decade, open world games have lost their sense of wonder for one of work. The one thing no one wants to admit in a marketing meeting is that bigger isn’t necessarily better anymore.
Also read: GTA 6 extended look preview: What to expect
Take any AAA world map today, and you will see the equivalent of a little kid running amok with stickers. Question marks, exclamation points, camps to take down, towers to ascend, treasure chests to unlock – whatever else is out there on that third pixel from the left. The map is no longer a map but rather a spreadsheet with pictures attached.
The beauty of exploring something was that you had nothing to go by; you did not know anything out there. Today, however, you are being told everything up front, and then invited to find excitement in marching to your own marker and unlocking the prize that you have already been promised. That is not exploration, that is fulfillment logistics.
Let’s take the case of Far Cry 6. Take out the Cuba-themed paint job and what you’ve got is the same outpost capture, tower climb, and check point liberation sequence that was seen in Far Cry 3 way back in 2012. Different setting, same old Excel sheet.
At some point in time, the publishing companies realized that “hours of gameplay” was an important selling point in itself regardless of the quality of the game. Assassin’s Creed Valhalla had 100 hours of gameplay on average, 150 hours for completionists, and even people who actually enjoyed the game concede that it’s too much time spent with Vikings. The size stopped becoming valuable.
Also read: Vivo S2 in Digit Test Labs: Seven years later, the S series returns with a 7,050mAh battery
It’s at this point that we get upset. Not because the game is too long. It’s because it’s bad. We demanded one but received the other instead.
Crafting. Skills. Tiered equipment. Factions and their relationships with the player. Building bases. All of these seem like depth on paper. In reality, most of them are just obstacles disguised as progression; things you need to take care of first before you can get down to what you actually started the game to do. Depth does not consist of a stat screen. Depth is a world that responds to the actions of the player in it.
A prime example of this problem is Star Wars Outlaws. An entire universe boiled down to a reputation system, which you need to work up with rival gangsters just to get vendor unlocks, all for additional material, which many critics pointed out to be nothing but filler to a story that does not require any. This Star Wars game turns being a scoundrel into bureaucracy. Depth is not an inventory; depth is a living world, responding to what you do inside of it.
And this is the awkward part. It’s not just Ubisoft anymore. The formula used so perfectly by Far Cry and Assassin’s Creed – where unlocking the towers means unlocking the map, and everything else involves collecting more things and clearing outposts – is quietly becoming the default package for any open-world game developer, even those who have never before worked on an Ubisoft game. The end result? A genre where half the big games released each year seem the same.
The darkest joke here is Skull and Bones, a game that took over a decade to ship and still managed to arrive feeling like a live-service open world built entirely out of spare Ubisoft parts. Even the studio that literally invented the formula couldn’t make it feel fresh the eleventh time around. That should have been the warning shot the whole industry needed.
Open-world gaming isn’t really dying. Not only did Elden Ring not die from going open-world, but it ended up becoming the most successful project by FromSoftware ever. Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom redefined the exploration experience and were showered in multiple Game of the Year awards. Even a technically faulty Pokémon Legends: Arceus has a great turn out for the franchise.
Therefore, the real story here is not “open-world is dead.” It’s a narrower story and a more damning one. The formulaic open-world genre is dead. Players aren’t tired of having large maps. They are tired of large maps that treat them like a series of tasks rather than characters themselves. The games that still make us feel something are the games that reminded themselves the whole point of an open world was a world, not a series of icons.
The genre didn’t lose its charm because it got bigger. It lost its charm because too many studios confused size for soul, and forgot that the whole point of an open world was never how much was in it. It was how much you wanted to find out for yourself.
Also read: EA is now owned by a Saudi Arabia-backed investor group: All details