Sam Altman is reportedly again facing scrutiny over conflicts of interest after court documents revealed that he holds more than $2 billion worth of stakes in companies that have commercial relationships with OpenAI. The disclosures emerged during ongoing legal proceedings linked to a lawsuit against the AI company and its leadership.
As per the documents presented in court, Altman has investments in at least nine companies that either partnered with or conducted business with OpenAI by the end of 2025. The disclosed investments include a stake worth approximately $1.7 billion in Helion Energy and around $633 million in Stripe. Other firms linked to the filings include Cerebras, Lattice, Humane, Formation Bio and several AI-focused startups.
During the testimony, Altman reportedly stated that he head rescued himself from discussions and approvals involving companies where he held financial interests. He also clarified that he does not directly own equity in OpenAI itself, despite building substantial wealth via venture capital investments made before and during his tenure at the company.
Also read: Meta launches Instagram Instants, a Snapchat rival: Features, how it works and availability details
The court proceedings additionally examined OpenAI’s partnerships with companies like Helion and Reddit. Altman said OpenAI’s board handled approvals for certain deals to avoid conflicts. In the case of Helion, he testified that he stepped away from negotiations while the companies explored energy-related agreements.
The controversy has also attracted political and regulatory attention in the United States. Attorneys-general from 10 Republican-led states have reportedly urged the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to examine OpenAI’s governance and potential conflicts ahead of any future IPO plans. Separately, a congressional oversight committee has sought additional information about OpenAI’s internal policies regarding conflicts of interest.
Musk’s legal team has argued that Altman’s financial interests raise concerns around corporate governance and charitable obligations tied to OpenAI’s structure. Altman has denied wrongdoing and maintained that appropriate recusal procedures were followed during sensitive negotiations.