Intel is coming to mobile phones! Really! The chipmaker is gearing up to show off its Medfield processors at CES this year, which would be exciting if I hadn't heard this same tale way too many times before.
Intel is the company that cries wolf in mobile. Back in 2006, Intel made the mistake of ditching its Xscale line, the processors used in many early smartphones and successful PDAs. Under the questionable guidance of Marvell, Xscale then went from a dominant mobile brand to just one among many chip lines out there.
That left Intel with absolutely zero access to mobile devices. Ever since then, the company's been trying to get back into the game. But rather than enhance industry-standard ARM designs, Intel's been trying to sell everyone on x86-based chips.
Nobody's listened so far. Here are some highlights of Intel's failed push into mobile:
Intel sells off Xscale, which had won a 2004 PCMag Technical Excellence
award for heralding a new era of multimedia smartphones. Xscale was used in successful products like HP's iPAQs, Motorola's Q series, the Dell Axim and the Palm Treo. According to The Register
, Intel wanted to push x86-based chips into smartphones rather than sticking with ARM designs.
At that year's Intel Developer Forum, Intel says it has two new chips
designed for devices with 4-inch screens. Menlow and Moorestown make it into exactly zero popular handheld devices over the next few years.
March 2008: Intel introduces the Atom processor, saying it will power "MIDs," or handheld, mobile Internet devices. Over the next year many companies introduce MIDs, but nobody buys any of them. Rather than being a power-guzzling mobile chipset, the Atom finds success in the netbook realm as a slow but power-efficient laptop chipset.
Intel introduces the CE 3100, its first system-on-a-chip for consumer electronics. The CE 3100 generates several smart TV announcements
but fewer actual sales of smart TVs.
Intel brings a "MID bar" to Mobile World Congress. In Hebrew, "midbar" means "wilderness," as in "forty years wandering in the." Intel also announces an alliance with LG
to produce more MIDs nobody wants.
Intel says the second-generation Atom, called Moorestown, will be a real
mobile chipset. Intel introduces the first phone based on the Atom Moorestown processor, the LG GW990
. It is about the size and shape of a brick. It never appears in any large market. However, Intel keeps talking up Moorestown throughout 2010.
Intel joins with Nokia to promote MeeGo
, a new Linux-based OS that's the merger of Intel's Moblin and Nokia's Maemo. MeeGo is a stunning failure; Intel abandoned the project
in September 2011.
Intel CEO Paul Otellini says Windows 8 will run on smartphones
with Intel chips. Other than one Steve Ballmer misquote last November, Microsoft has held a party line since then that Windows 8 will run on tablets and PCs, but not phones.
MeeGo and Moorestown don't impress the market. Let's try again! Intel says its "Medfield" system-on-a-chip designs will come in 2012
. Not much comes of Intel's mobile strategy in 2011 as the company gears up for Medfield, which will be shown at CES 2012.
To recap: fail, fail, fail, fail, fail. Faily fail fail.
Why Intel Might Succeed
There are a few new factors which might improve Intel's chances this time around. Back in September, Google said it would optimize Android
for the next generation of Intel processors. That gives Intel a better OS than the proprietary Moblin/MeeGo nonsense it was working with before.
Windows 8 is also on the horizon, and while Windows 8 will work on ARM processors - a major threat to Intel - it means there will be a major tablet-oriented OS where the vast majority of legacy apps will be Intel-optimized. That could sway tablet developers to work with Intel chips.
In the phone world, though, the massive ecosystem around ARM means that Intel's sales pitch will have to be very compelling. The mobile-phone chip world is much more competitive than the desktop world Intel is used to. Within the ARM ecosystem alone, TI, Qualcomm, Nvidia, ST-Ericsson, Rockchip and others are constantly fighting for dominance. And mobile phone makers who want to try new architectures can also turn to MIPS
Intel has for years coasted on its critical mass in the PC industry. Even Apple came over to Intel after many years because of its low cost and economies of scale. But Intel doesn't have that advantage over companies like TI and Qualcomm in mobile.
It's not just about matching ARM-based designs on speed and power consumption, either. Intel will have to provide significantly better performance or lower power consumption to pull manufacturers away from the default, ARM world. Intel says it can do that by using a 32-nanometer process to produce its new system-on-a-chip. That's a solid argument, but Intel has made this argument too many times before. ARM vendors aren't far behind, either; both TI and Qualcomm have chips coming next year based on an even more efficient 28nm process.
We have to remember Michael Gartenberg's First Law. (Okay, maybe it's his second or third; not so sure of the numbering.) The dean of mobile tech analysts once told me, "never underestimate anyone very rich and very patient." That goes for Microsoft, and it goes for Intel as well.
But Intel has failed so many times at providing compelling smartphone chips, that I'm going to have to look at its latest foray very, very cautiously. You should, too.
Copyright © 2010 Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
source:2012 Mobile Roadmap