ASUS Strix GeForce GTX 970
MSI GE60 2PE
Transcend StoreJet 35U3
Micromax Canvas Tab P666 Android Tablet: First impressions
Benefits of using SSDs
Selecting the right SSD for your PC and Laptop
How Microsoft Azure leapfrogs backup with cloud snapshots
Here are 5 ways to get a OnePlus One invite In India
How tech is taking football to the next level
Classic FPS games are a dying breed
Slowly gathering steam...
The obsession within
Carmick Shift: Can John Carmack and Oculus Rift change the world?
CyanogenMod won't support OnePlus One in India, courtesy Micromax
Report: Spam spreads faster via hacked email accounts
HP launches dual-SIM Android Slate 6 Voice Tab II in India
Skype for Android gets picture-in-picture feature
Twitter will track other apps on your smartphone to "improve" ads
Micromax Canvas Tab P666
Asus PadFone mini
Gionee Elife S5.1
Celkon Win 400
Karbonn Titanium S6
Case Study: Building an award winning multi-touch enabled music app
Case Study: Developing a Health App for Windows 8
Case Study: Developing an augmented reality app for Intel based devices
Use Spotify, Netflix in India on your PC, Android smartphone
Overview: Implementing fast real-time GPU-based image blur algorithms
Xiaomi Redmi Note Review
A close look at Apple iPhone 6 Plus
Android 5.0 Lollipop Update
Nokia Lumia 730 Review
How to upgrade your laptop or ultrabook's hard drive to an mSATA or M.2 SSD
Samsung Galaxy S6: Rumor Roundup
Top 10 tech fails in the last five years
Xiaomi Redmi Note: Benchmarks and camera samples
Top Black Friday deals for those with U.S. connections
17 must have apps for any Android device (plus alternatives)
Intel Developer Zone
Intel Windows Developer Zone
Dsk International Campus Zone
Asia's Largest Conference for the Internet Infrastructure IndustryRegister Now & Stand a Chance to Win an iPad!Click to know more
Want to Sell your old Gadgets?Post your ad on Junglee in 3 easy steps and reach thousands of buyer in your city for free
Click to know more
I see that Eric Schmidt is back in the news with an erroneous assertion that if you've got nothing to hide, you should not worry about your privacy.
I'm always stunned when a billionaire with a private life goes on about how trivial privacy is. And he is not the only one. I often hear people say, "if you are not doing anything wrong, then what's the fear?" Scott McNealy famously said, "Privacy is dead. Get over it."
All these folks miss the point time and time again. Privacy is not about just you and me. It in itself is a milieu—one that needs nurturing, not a lax attitude.
Privacy is not important because I do or do not have something to hide. I would argue that lack of privacy regulations, whether by rule or agreement, creates total societal corruption. A Soviet-style state. Orwellian, like 1984.
Privacy laws protect the public from government officials whose personal lives may be compromised, for example. Say a public official has a sister who is a hooker. Someone finds out through some slack privacy policies. Only a few people know this, but they blackmail the politician into voting for laws that do not represent the public sentiment that he or she is supposed to regard. That's a problem. It invites corruption.
This is a silly but valid example. Spies and snoops operate in the world for a reason. Are we supposed to make their jobs easier with lenient policies?
OK, how about stock market manipulation? With slipshod privacy, how easy is it to eavesdrop on certain investors to figure out what they are up to and invest ahead of the curve? Apparently nobody sees this as a problem, either.
And what is with Eric Schmidt anyway? I wonder if he is even sincere about all this. Some years back, a CNet reporter did some Googling and dug up a bunch of personal information about Schmidt, including his home address, which he then published. Not happy about this, Schmidt banned the publication from all Google events. Based on his own attitude toward privacy, why would he care?
In some cases, you do want your personal privacy protected for honest reasons. Sometimes you do have something to hide. You are working for Company A and are up for a raise. In the meantime, Company B has been talking to you about coming to work for them. If that information got back to Company A, you might not get the raise but instead get fired. It's not corrupt, but it's certainly information you'd want to protect. How does this make you a criminal? How is this something you should not do?
Or even the more mundane: you are throwing a surprise party for your wife and would like to keep it a secret. But Schmidt says, "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place." Really? I shouldn't be throwing a surprise party?
Is everyone completely whacked out over the simplicity of privacy and why it is important? How did protecting privacy somehow only become associated with criminal activity? By reducing the argument to the simplistic "what have you got to hide?" you have created an incredibly poisonous argument that has nothing to do with the need for privacy. How about asking whether you would you like a government camera in your bathroom? Why not? What have you got to hide?
Seriously, reject these discussions. Protect privacy because it is the right and civilized thing to do. Eric Schmidt, Scott McNealy, and the others should be ashamed of their patronizing attitude toward privacy and the public. Stop it!
Copyright © 2010 Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc