HTC Desire 516
LUXA2 Groovy Bluetooth Speaker
Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus
Asus Zenfone 5
HTC One (M8)
Micromax Unite 2 A106
Xiaomi MIUI reviewed
LG G3 First Impression: Great screen, smart design & power packed.
Xiaomi Mi3 quick review: Performance test, camera quality and design
Analysis: How can mobile VAS segment hit the revival path
Android sub 10K battle: Asus Zenfone 5 vs Moto E vs Xiaomi Redmi 1S
How tech is taking football to the next level
Classic FPS games are a dying breed
Slowly gathering steam...
The obsession within
Carmick Shift: Can John Carmack and Oculus Rift change the world?
Network coverage, speed and availability influence smartphone experience: Ericsson study
Xiaomi Mi 4 announced, runs on Snapdragon 801, 5-inch full HD display
Google Maps now available in Hindi, voice navigation coming soon
Facebook launches Save button to bookmark content
Windows 9 start menu leaked in screenshots
HTC Desire 516 launched in India for Rs. 14,200
Xiaomi goes for the kill, prices Mi 3, Redmi Note & Redmi 1S aggressively
ISPs block Torrent, hosting websites after court order: Reports
Asus launches ZenFone series of Android phones in India, prices them competitively
CyanogenMod finds 'Heads up' notification mode in Android
Obi Octopus S520
Samsung Galaxy S5 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note
How to Set Up an NDK Project to Compile for Multiple Target Platforms
Guide: How To Implement native Intel x86 Support for Android Apps to boost performance
How to create your own TOR url
How to create your own lyrics video
How to become a cyber-forensics expert
How to migrate to an Android smartphone from any OS
How to become a social media star
Sony Xperia E1 Dual - First Impressions
Android KitKat Phones Under 10K
Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus Full Review
HTC Desire 516 Full Review
Bin Lin President & Co Founder, Xiaomi Global unveils the Mi Pad
Preview: LG G Watch smartwatch with Android Wear
Android app stores: 5 best alternatives to Google Play Store
Hands-On: LG G3, a flagship Android phone with an awesome screen
Xiaomi Mi3 build quality and size comparison
5 awesome, beautiful PC case mods
Register for the Digit.in Reward Program
How to earn points?
I see that Eric Schmidt is back in the news with an erroneous assertion that if you've got nothing to hide, you should not worry about your privacy.
I'm always stunned when a billionaire with a private life goes on about how trivial privacy is. And he is not the only one. I often hear people say, "if you are not doing anything wrong, then what's the fear?" Scott McNealy famously said, "Privacy is dead. Get over it."
All these folks miss the point time and time again. Privacy is not about just you and me. It in itself is a milieu—one that needs nurturing, not a lax attitude.
Privacy is not important because I do or do not have something to hide. I would argue that lack of privacy regulations, whether by rule or agreement, creates total societal corruption. A Soviet-style state. Orwellian, like 1984.
Privacy laws protect the public from government officials whose personal lives may be compromised, for example. Say a public official has a sister who is a hooker. Someone finds out through some slack privacy policies. Only a few people know this, but they blackmail the politician into voting for laws that do not represent the public sentiment that he or she is supposed to regard. That's a problem. It invites corruption.
This is a silly but valid example. Spies and snoops operate in the world for a reason. Are we supposed to make their jobs easier with lenient policies?
OK, how about stock market manipulation? With slipshod privacy, how easy is it to eavesdrop on certain investors to figure out what they are up to and invest ahead of the curve? Apparently nobody sees this as a problem, either.
And what is with Eric Schmidt anyway? I wonder if he is even sincere about all this. Some years back, a CNet reporter did some Googling and dug up a bunch of personal information about Schmidt, including his home address, which he then published. Not happy about this, Schmidt banned the publication from all Google events. Based on his own attitude toward privacy, why would he care?
In some cases, you do want your personal privacy protected for honest reasons. Sometimes you do have something to hide. You are working for Company A and are up for a raise. In the meantime, Company B has been talking to you about coming to work for them. If that information got back to Company A, you might not get the raise but instead get fired. It's not corrupt, but it's certainly information you'd want to protect. How does this make you a criminal? How is this something you should not do?
Or even the more mundane: you are throwing a surprise party for your wife and would like to keep it a secret. But Schmidt says, "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place." Really? I shouldn't be throwing a surprise party?
Is everyone completely whacked out over the simplicity of privacy and why it is important? How did protecting privacy somehow only become associated with criminal activity? By reducing the argument to the simplistic "what have you got to hide?" you have created an incredibly poisonous argument that has nothing to do with the need for privacy. How about asking whether you would you like a government camera in your bathroom? Why not? What have you got to hide?
Seriously, reject these discussions. Protect privacy because it is the right and civilized thing to do. Eric Schmidt, Scott McNealy, and the others should be ashamed of their patronizing attitude toward privacy and the public. Stop it!
Copyright © 2010 Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc