Corsair Carbide 100R Silent Edition
House of Marley Get Up Stand Up
HTC Desire 820s
ZOTAC GTX 960 AMP! Edition
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 970 G1 Gaming
How Letv plans to surpass Xiaomi, Samsung & others in India
4G, Wi-Fi to drive next round of Internet revolution in India
HTC One E9+: First Impressions
Intel Galileo Board Assembly
Intel INDE 2015: support of Android OS 5.0 ("Lollipop")
Don't read this, lest you get offended!
How tech is taking football to the next level
Classic FPS games are a dying breed
Slowly gathering steam...
The obsession within
Google extends support for Chrome for Windows XP
Sony Xperia E4g LTE smartphone launched at Rs. 13290
Rumour: Microsoft working on high-end Lumia 940, 940XL
Cyanogen not bundling or preinstalling Microsoft apps into CyanogenMod [Updated]
YU Yureka Lollipop update rolling out now
HTC One E9 plus
HTC One M9 plus
iBerry Auxus Beast
Motorola Moto E (Gen 2) 4G
Get Up Stand Up
How to use Intel XDK plugins for Sublime Text
Intel XDK Update - HTML5 Games, Sublime Text* & Easier to Get Started
Steps to add x86 support to Android Apps Using Unity
3 easy steps for maximum performance for your Android emulator (Intel HAXM)
How does your GPU affect your image blur algorithms
Top 5 Apps to train your Brain
World's first USB Type-C port smartphones - Le 1, Le 1 Pro & Le Max
Philips 65-inch 4K UHD Ambilight TV
HTC Desire 326G - First Impressions
HTC Desire 820s Dual SIM Review
First look: Philips 4K UHD Ambilight TV
Top Launches Of The Week: April 17, 2015
Top Stories Of The Week: April 17, 2015
In Pictures: Le 1, Le 1 Pro and Le Max smartphones
15 awesome new games for Android (April 2015)
Intel Developer Zone
Intel Windows Developer Zone
Google has announced it will be taking action to demote Chrome’s search rankings for at least 60 days, after its video advertising campaign accidentally breached the company’s strict rules against paid sponsorships and links.
The online search giant had commissioned Unruly Media to promote a Chrome video advertisement, across various blogs, as paid featured content. However, some of the blog sites weren’t too careful, and included links back to the Chrome download page themselves – not an prescribed part of the contract. The real problem arose when these hyperlinks were not given a ”nofollow” attribute, which Google requires paid links to have, when it conducts its trawling.
Essence Digital clarified Google’s role in the matter, that Google only agreed to buy online video ads on the blogs in question. The company later apologized to Google for causing the confusion.
"We want to be perfectly clear here: Google never approved a sponsored-post campaign. They only agreed to buy online video ads. Google have consistently avoided paid postings to promote their products, because in their view these kind of promotions are not transparent or in the best interests of users.In this case, Google were subjected to this activity through media that encouraged bloggers to create what appeared to be paid posts, were often of poor quality and out of line with Google standards. We apologize to Google who clearly didn't authorize this."
"We want to be perfectly clear here: Google never approved a sponsored-post campaign. They only agreed to buy online video ads. Google have consistently avoided paid postings to promote their products, because in their view these kind of promotions are not transparent or in the best interests of users.
In this case, Google were subjected to this activity through media that encouraged bloggers to create what appeared to be paid posts, were often of poor quality and out of line with Google standards. We apologize to Google who clearly didn't authorize this."
The CEO of Unruly Media, Scott Button, elaborated a lot further, when he told the Guardian:
"A blogger, who we didn't ask to link to a Google Chrome page, linked to a Google Chrome page, and did so without using the nofollow attribute. Obviously they shouldn't do this in the context of a blog post that embeds one of our sponsored videos. As soon as we found out about it, we got it fixed. To be clear, we're not in the business of getting bloggers to write about products or link to advertisers' websites. We distrubute branded video content, and we pay bloggers (and big websites and app developers) when their audiences watch the videos. That's what Google paid us to do, and that's our business. The SEM angle is basically a red herring - it doesn't bear any relation to our business nor any relation to the objectives of the Google Chrome campaign."
A Google statement also responded to allegations:
“We have consistently avoided paid sponsorships, including paying bloggers to promote our products, because these kind of promotions are not transparent or in the best interests of users. We’re now looking at what changes we need to make to ensure that this never happens again.”
Source: The Guardian