Asus Zenfone 2
Corsair Carbide 100R Silent Edition
House of Marley Get Up Stand Up
HTC Desire 820s
Why Net Equality is more important than Net Neutrality
Creating a Yocto Image for the Intel Galileo board using Split Layers
64-bit Android and Android Run Time
Intel INDE as a Tool for Game Developers using Commercial Game Engines
Intel Edison Board: Getting Started – WiFi
Don't read this, lest you get offended!
How tech is taking football to the next level
Classic FPS games are a dying breed
Slowly gathering steam...
The obsession within
Net Neutrality: Anonymous India takes down TRAI's website
Motorola discounts Moto G & Moto X by Rs. 3,000
Xiaomi's newest investor: Ratan Tata
A new Google Nexus 5 smartphone coming this year?
Nepal Earthquake: Where you can donate
Micromax Canvas Tab P480
Xiaomi Mi 4i
Lava Iris Alfa L
How to use Intel XDK plugins for Sublime Text
Intel XDK Update - HTML5 Games, Sublime Text* & Easier to Get Started
Steps to add x86 support to Android Apps Using Unity
3 easy steps for maximum performance for your Android emulator (Intel HAXM)
How does your GPU affect your image blur algorithms
Amazon Kindle Voyage
Acer Chromebook 15 - First Impressions
Acer Aspire Z3 AIO - First Impressions
Acer Aspire Switch 10 - First Impressions
Acer Aspire R11 - First Look
Lava Iris X8: In Pictures [Promotion]
Next@Acer 2015: New Laptops, Hybrids, Wearables, Smartphones
Xiaomi Mi4i: Performance test and camera samples
Top Stories Of The Week: April 24, 2015
Top launches of the week: April 24, 2015
Intel Windows Developer Zone
Intel Developer Zone
Intel IoT Developer Zone
Hackers group Anonymous briefly hacked and took down websites of The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) after the Department of Telecom (DoT) ordered the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) blocking of 73 URLs that featured content against the private business school and its director Arindam Chaudhri. The IIPM director has also responded to the ongoing controversy, saying he is happy defamatory links with malicious interests were taken down.
According to a Times of India report, the websites IIPM.in and IIPM.edu were down for about nine hours due to the attack. At the time of writing this news, both the websites are live.
Here's what Anonymous said on Twitter:
Earlier, following a Gwalior district court order, the DoT had directed the ISPs to block the URLs. The list of the 73 URLs to be blocked astonishingly included a July 2012 notice from the University Grants Commission (UGC) that said:
“It is hereby informed to the public at large and students that Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) is not a University within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956. Further, as per Section 22 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956, the Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) does not have the right of conferring or granting degrees as specified by the University Grants Commission under Section 22(3) of the University Grants Commission Act. It is further clarified for information that Indian Institute of Planning and Management is neither entitled to award MBA/BBA/BCA degree nor it is recognized by UGC.”
A PDF version of the UGC message is available though, and can be read through Google Docs.
According to a Wikipedia entry titled 'Indian Institute of Planning and Management advertising and blogging controversy', the blocked URLs include articles of news portals like Outlook, Careers 360, The Caravan and others. Check out the Wikipedia entry here.
Screenshot of a website blocked, courtesy TheHindu
Blocking of the UGC page and other URLs containing criticism of IIPM has sparked a new round of controversy with the issue of freedom of expression once again coming to the limelight.
“Our biggest concern is that DoT has taken this action by itself. We haven’t been informed about this notice. In the conventional course, we expect it to inform the said media houses. So, at the first instance, we will take this matter up with DoT itself, and if further needed, we will take legal action also,” LiveMint quotes The Caravan editor Anant Nath as saying.
Reports suggest the government was a party to the defamation suit
As per the latest round of development, Firstpost quotes Arindam Chaudhuri as saying : “...Google failed to comply by the order and subsequently, the Hon’ble Court asked ICERT to block the those defamatory URLs till further orders after hearing the application filed by him and issued notice to IIPM to be as one of the respondent as well and we shall file our reply in the Hon’ble Court.”
“With respect to UGC links, I would say UGC and AICTE are organisations full of bribe-seeking corrupt people where even at the top they have a track record of being caught red handed and being jailed. The standard of education they have created in the nation is shameful, to say the least,” he said.
“IPM is proud to have no affiliation with them and proud that it imparts a quality of education that is at par with the best globally, which is, might I say, thanks to our independence of approach and non-caring attitude towards UGC. I suspect that UGC — at the behest of some of our petty competitors with dirty past records of filth and cheating, and public notices against them (some who now even boast of being supposedly ‘top-class’ universities) — had been deliberately spreading misleading information about IIPM to hurt its business interests and had even gone to the extent of falsely calling IIPM a fake university.”
The IIPM controversy comes at a time when the country is already debating over the issue of freedom of expression, especially on the Internet. Last year, a similar controversy erupted when Maharashtra Police arrested two girls for posting anti-Thackery Facebook status.
However, the IIPM controversy has taken the debate over 'Internet freedom' and 'web censorship' to another level as it's perhaps the first time a government page has been blocked. While allegations and blame games are set to make the issue murkier in the near future, the government shouldn’t delay to intervene into the matter and ensure 'freedom of speech' as well as 'freedom of criticism' should be maintained.
What do you think of the ongoing IIPM controversy? Let us know in the comments section below: