Digit Top 10
Get Digit Magazine!
HELP ME BUY
Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Neo Classic
Micromax Unite 3
Micromax Canvas Express 2: First Impressions
5 reasons why the OnePlus 2 might not be the 2015 flagship killer
Here's what we know about Earth 2.0 so far
Fight for the Sweet Spot: Yu Yureka Plus vs Lenovo K3 Note vs Xiaomi Mi 4i
First Impressions: Sony Bravia Android TV
Don't read this, lest you get offended!
How tech is taking football to the next level
Classic FPS games are a dying breed
Slowly gathering steam...
The obsession within
see All digit top 10
Digit Top 10 is a list of best products across various categories, rated by Digit Test Labs in Mumbai and Delhi.
Micromax launches Canvas Express 2 with 13MP camera & octa-core SoC, at Rs. 5,999
Lava Pixel V1, next gen Android One phone launched at Rs. 11,349
Moto G (3rd Gen) leaked on Flipkart, at Rs. 11,999
Lava Pixel V1 Android One smartphone leaked just ahead of launch
Leaked video allegedly shows OnePlus 2 getting benchmarked
Panasonic launches Love T10 at Rs. 3,690
Intex launches 40-inch Full HD TV for Rs. 35,999
Lava Flair Z1 with Android v5 for Rs. 5,699 to sell from next week
Logitech introduces mini wireless speaker X50 for Rs. 2495
UCWeb rolls out new updates for desktop and iOS browsers
OnePlus Silver Bullets
Lava Pixel V1
Spice XLife 512
Spice XLife 431q
Spice XLife 431q Lite
How to use Intel XDK plugins for Sublime Text
Intel XDK Update - HTML5 Games, Sublime Text* & Easier to Get Started
Steps to add x86 support to Android Apps Using Unity
3 easy steps for maximum performance for your Android emulator (Intel HAXM)
How does your GPU affect your image blur algorithms
Acer's new IoT solutions
Sony Bravia W950C Android TV (50-inch)
LG G4 - Life's not so good. [Review]
Gionee E8 - First Look
Intex iRist smartwatch - First Impressions
How to prepare for your Windows 10 update
10 apps worth trying out on your Google Cardboard
21 Upcoming and new phones in India (July 2015)
Best music oriented IEMs you can buy under 2k (for all budgets)
Samsung Galaxy J5 & J7: First Impressions
Intel Android Developer Zone
Intel Windows Developer Zone
Intel IoT Developer Zone
Intel Game Developer Zone
Who we are
Meet our Authors
Buy Current Issue
Buy Previous Issue
Digit Tech Hunt Contest
Be a Digit Tech Star
A क అ
User Name / Email Address
If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please
with it instead.
Hold the phone: Microsoft wants to buy Nokia and Nvidia?
Here's an interesting bit of speculation from Information Week's Paul McDougall—Microsoft could be in the market to acquire not just key Windows Phone partner Nokia but also chipmaker Nvidia.
There are a lot of problems with this double-barreled dealmaking approach for Redmond, which we'll talk about in a bit. First, let's look at McDougall's logic.
For all intents and purposes, it sure looks like
Microsoft wants to "adopt the Apple model"
of extreme vertical integration for its product development cycles, meaning it seeks a whole lot more control and input on what it's producing from the silicon level on up.
Evidence? For starters, Microsoft has willingly accepted the risk of
fallout from ticked-off OEM partners
by releasing its new Surface tablets. The software giant may also be planning
its own in-house Windows Phone 8 device
and a 7-inch Surface slate that may be a smaller version of the current Surface or an
Xbox-integrated gaming tab
"So Microsoft may be getting into the hardware game for keeps," McDougall writes, and the first-order motivator is that Redmond "is sick of watching Apple's beautiful new products draw raves and set fanboy hearts afire while its partners come out with Windows-based devices that, well, let's just say can be less than impressive."
The "volume over quality and quantity over margin" model that's fueled the Windows empire for so long is simply looking a lot less strategically sound these days, the Information Week editor-at-large concludes.
Throw in questions about the long-term viability of being a software-only vendor in a world where the likes of Google run on a model that gives an operating system away for free, and you can see where Microsoft may be seriously considering a bold new approach to doing business.
Why Nokia? Basically because it would be really cheap to acquire right now, according to McDougall, who figures the Finnish handset maker "could be bought—lock, stock, and worldwide production network—for about $14 billion," or "a relative song."
Why Nvidia? Because Microsoft needs a chip design asset to compete with Apple, which designs the ARM-based A-Series processors for its iPhones and iPads. Redmond has a long relationship with Nvidia, and has first right of refusal on a deal to buy the chipmaker, as McDougall himself
reported last June
Nvidia could be had for $14 or $15 billion, he figures, and Microsoft's sitting on more than $66 billion so it could pull off both deals.
So that's McDougall's argument. What's wrong with it?
For starters, let's forget about the Apple model for a second and look at the Hewlett-Packard model. HP's current struggles show us that buying up a bunch of stuff willy-nilly can lead to big problems down the line. Heck, let's just recall Microsoft's own recent history with a big acquisition that wound up causing trouble, namely the 2007 deal for aQuantive that led to
a $6.19 billion write down
in the company's fiscal fourth quarter and its first quarterly loss ever.
There's also the macroeconomic picture to consider. There's still a lot of uncertainty in global markets as our recovery from the 2008 economic crisis and ensuing Great Recession remains historically sluggish and uninspiring. Is this the climate for a company like Microsoft to halve its cash reserves chasing a business model that only one uniquely constructed tech company has successfully pulled off? There's no doubt that Apple's recent success has been awesome to watch, but it also represents a sample size of, you know, one.
But don't just rely on my quibbles with McDougall's thinking. Here's what a couple of industry analysts have to say about it.
Patrick Moorhead of Moor Insights & Strategy was dubious about the risk-reward trade-off of a Nokia acquisition and didn't even bother to address the more radical notion of a Microsoft deal for Nvidia.
"Microsoft's communicated direction is 'devices and services.' Buying Nokia would certainly support this direction, but it would be very risky for Microsoft," he said.
Jack Gold of J. Gold Associates also focused on the Nokia element and was flat-out against such an acquisition. To begin with, he questioned whether aping Apple was even a good idea in theory, positing that the iPhone maker's model "is seriously in doubt longer term."
"Microsoft should not buy Nokia—it would probably be bad for both, and for [Windows Phone] in general," Gold said. "Next, Microsoft doesn't really care if it makes any money on the OS. The money is in the services it will offer, and that will not go to zero, despite what Google does. Everyone said Google would drive Office revenues to zero—seems like it was doing pretty darn well last I looked."
"Lastly, any vendor who competes with its customers, as Microsoft would do if it actively got into the hardware environment, would drive its OEMs to either go out of business, deemphasize Windows, which would have a negative effect on Microsoft, or simply make end users totally confused, which is never good for the market," he continued.
"And by the way, margins on most commodity hardware these days is terrible—why take that on?" the analyst added.
Copyright © 2010 Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc