Asus GTX 980 Matrix Platinum
Free Speech and Privacy in India: A lawyer's take
In focus: ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 App
Introduction to integration in Azure
Huawei Honor T1: Maximizing Efficiency and affordability
Why Cyanogen wants Google to leave Android alone
How tech is taking football to the next level
Classic FPS games are a dying breed
Slowly gathering steam...
The obsession within
Carmick Shift: Can John Carmack and Oculus Rift change the world?
Creative launches the Sound Blaster Roar portable bluetooth speaker in India
Symantec suggests 7 security resolutions you should make in 2015
HTC Desire 816G octa-core smartphone launched at Rs. 19,990
Android leads with 81.2 pc global smartphone market share in 2014
Bluewire: Bluetooth headset that lets you wirelessly record phone conversations
Asus GTX980 Matrix Platinum
Audio Technica ATH-MSR7
Electrolux G20M.WW-CG 20 L Grill Microwave Oven
How to add x86 support to Android apps using the Unity game engine
How To Excel At Great UX Design
How to be a Resourceful Gamer
How to Install an SSD in your desktop or laptop PC
How to optimize SSD performance in Windows
ESPN Cricinfo launches revamped mobile app
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge Features
Oppo R5 is slim on design but not on price. [REVIEW]
Xiaomi Angers Chinese Fans
Asus Transformer Pad TF103CG Review
First Look: Windows 10 Pro Technical Preview
Size zero: Gionee S5.1 vs Oppo R5
Xiaomi Mi4 Quick Review: Performance tests and camera quality
The definitive gaming gear buying guide
Take control of your Android device with these apps
Intel Developer Zone
Intel Windows Developer Zone
Dsk International Campus Zone
Snapchat and Facebook Poke became an instant hit few days ago, promising secure messaging amongst users. When they say some things are too good to be true, some things really are too good to be true.
Both the apps promised Mission Impossible-like functionality, causing messages to disappear once they’d been read. If they weren’t read, then they would expire after a small period of time. However, a method was recently discovered that allowed the user to extract videos from Snapchat and Poke, as both the apps store a cached copy of the video on the device.
With regards to file destruction, Poke seems to fare slightly better than Snapchat. If the video has been viewed on Poke, the video is deleted, local copy included. Snapchat, however, retains the local copy even after viewing. So if someone has sent you a video through either of the apps, choose not to view it, plug the iPhone into your computer and use a file browsing tool like iFunbox to retrieve the media.
After the loophole was discovered, Facebook has stated that while Poke was never meant to be a “secure messaging app,” they will regardless look into the loophole and work on a patch. Snapchat on the other hand is yet to make a statement. Our recommendation is that you stop relying on either of the apps to trade confidential matter, or images/videos/messages that you do not want lasting longer than it takes to read them.